Suchergebnisse

This article investigates the hidden curriculum of Ontario's New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP). The study involved interviews with 47 teacher educators from eight faculties of education. Responses revealed concerns about (a) who chooses the men‐ tors, (b) the probationary status of new teachers, and (c) the evaluation of new teach‐ ers' competence. In the opinion of some teacher educators, the structure of NTIP may discourage new teachers from critiquing the system that employs them thus decreas‐ ing the likelihood of their taking a critical democratic stance in their teaching. These findings have implications for any induction or mentorship program for new teach‐ ers. Key Words: teacher education, mentorship, social justice, critical democratic, Ontario New Teacher Induction ProgramCet article porte sur les objectifs cachés du Programme dʹinsertion professionnelle du nouveau personnel enseignant (PIPNPE) de l'Ontario. Pour cette recherche, les au‐ teurs ont interviewé 47 professeurs de pédagogie dans huit facultés d'éducation. Ces entrevues révèlent des inquiétudes au sujet (a) du mode de sélection des mentors, (b) du statut probatoire du nouveau personnel enseignant, (c) de l'évaluation des compé‐ tences du nouveau personnel enseignant. Selon certains des répondants, la structure du PIPNPE peut dissuader certains nouveaux enseignants de critiquer le système qui les emploie, ce qui diminue les chances qu'ils prennent une orientation démocratique critique dans leur enseignement. Ces observations ont des implications pour tout programme d'insertion professionnelle ou de mentorat s'adressant au nouveau per‐ sonnel enseignant. Mots clés : formation à l'enseignement, mentorat, justice sociale, critique, démocrati‐ que, Programme dʹinsertion professionnelle du nouveau personnel enseignant de l'Ontario.

Critical scholars view schooling as one piece of a larger struggle for democracy and social justice. We investigated 41 school administrators" perceptions about the role and importance of equity, diversity and social justice in new teacher induction in the province of Ontario. Interviews reveal that principals were interested in shaping teacher induction programming in their schools and school districts, but that they regularly prioritized technical issues like classroom management and pedagogy over systemic issues like equity and social justice. When asked directly about equity, principals spoke about learning styles, special needs and differentiated instruction, but they regularly ignored new teachers" abilities to counter systemic oppression—racism, sexism, and classism. Our findings suggest that without an explicit focus on equity and social justice in provincial policy documents, teacher induction programming runs the risk of reproducing a transmission model of new teacher education.